All persons are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
While you're here, please take a minute or two to leave a comment. Your participation at CrimeShadows News is greatly appreciated.
12 Aug

Lowdown on the Lowdown: Sex Offender Statistics

The following information has been gathered from the Department of Justice. It is based on data taken in the early 1990s. Don’t believe all the crap that sex offender sympathizers try to sell you. The truth can be seen in the statistics. Since some time has passed since this information was organized, we can only wonder if the situation has improved. If one reads the headlines each day, I think that the reality would more likely be that things are worse.

Sex Offenders

  • On a given day in 1994 there were approximately 234,000 offenders convicted of rape or sexual assault under the care, custody, or control of corrections agencies; nearly 60% of these sex offenders are under conditional supervision in the community.
  • The median age of the victims of imprisoned sexual assaulters was less than 13 years old; the median age of rape victims was about 22 years.
  • An estimated 24% of those serving time for rape and 19% of those serving time for sexual assault had been on probation or parole at the time of the offense for which they were in State prison in 1991.
  • Of the 9,691 male sex offenders released from prisons in 15 States in 1994, 5.3% were rearrested for a new sex crime within 3 years of release.
  • Of released sex offenders who allegedly committed another sex crime, 40% perpetrated the new offense within a year or less from their prison discharge.

Child Victimizers

  • Approximately 4,300 child molesters were released from prisons in 15 States in 1994. An estimated 3.3% of these 4,300 were rearrested for another sex crime against a child within 3 years of release from prison.
  • Among child molesters released from prison in 1994, 60% had been in prison for molesting a child 13 years old or younger.
  • Offenders who had victimized a child were on average 5 years older than the violent offenders who had committed their crimes against adults. Nearly 25% of child victimizers were age 40 or older, but about 10% of the inmates with adult victims fell in that age range.

Intimate Victimizers

  • About 4 in 10 inmates serving time in jail for intimate violence had a criminal justice status — on probation or parole or under a restraining order — at the time of the violent attack on an intimate.
  • About 1 in 4 convicted violent offenders confined in local jails had committed their crime against an intimate; about 7% of State prisoners serving time for violence had an intimate victim.
  • About half of all offenders convicted of intimate violence and confined in a local jail or a State prison had been drinking at the time of the offense. Jail inmates who had been drinking prior to the intimate violence consumed an average amount of ethanol equivalent to 10 beers.
  • About 8 in 10 inmates serving time in State prison for intimate violence had injured or killed their victim.

Also of interest is the report entitled “Sexual Assault of Young Children as Reported to Law Enforcement: Victim, Incident, and Offender Characteristics.” (Requires Adobe Reader)

This is a pretty comprehensive snapshot of data pertaining to sexual predators of children and their victims.

According to this report:

  • Crimes against juvenile victims are the large majority (67%) of sexual assaults handled by law enforcement agencies.
  • One of every seven victims was under the age of 6 years old.
  • Over a third of all sexual assaults involved a victim who was under the age of 12.

CrimeShadows News supports the Death Penalty for repeat sex offenders.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 12th, 2008 at 10:01 AM and is filed under Child molestation, Profile, Rape, Sex Offenders, catch & release, catch and release, child murders, children, death penalty. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can trackback from your own site.
Comments are posted by visitors and may not necessarily reflect the opinion of this website. Just because a comment is not removed, doesn't mean the message is endorsed by this site or the webmaster.

  • You are now calling me a liar along with your other ad hominem attacks. Please, name one statement that I have made that is not true. Do not paraphrase. Quote the statement as it was written --no need for an additional rant. If I have said anything that is not true, I will certainly apologize.
  • MSLGWCEO
    I have to apologize for confusing you with facts. I can see you have already made up your mind, regardless what ALL the studies and research says.
    Now, that is real confusing position to be in.
    You made statements that were not true, hence, the links. I back up my position with facts not personal opinions. You know what I form my opinion based on a lot of studies. Hundreds of them.
  • ----By the way, cfcoklahoma,org is NOT a sex offender advocasy site. It is a “Citizen’s For Legislative Change,” site.-----

    Way to put lipstick on a pig.

    You don't know me or everything that I believe, don't assume that you do. I make my own decisions. There is not party, group, person, doctrine, etc., that I can find myself in complete agreement with. Don't come here and judge someone you do not know.

    I do, however, know what I personally believe in, and I will continue to work for public awareness of known sex offenders. Period.

    As I have stated in another thread, I have allowed your position to be expressed here against my better judgment. I have done so in the interest of free and open discussion. Please, do not abuse this privilege with insults to my intelligence, overly long posts, and lists of links. This section is intended for brief comments directly related to the accompanying post.
  • MSLGWCEO
    By the way, cfcoklahoma,org is NOT a sex offender advocasy site. It is a "Citizen's For Legislative Change," site. We seek sane laws not bad ones based on the entertainment News media hysteria, myths and lies. The whores for ratings have you in their back pocket as do the whores for votes.
    You will believe anything they put out. We call them "sheeple."
  • MSLGWCEO
    Actually Cris, my scope of reading on this issue is extreamly broad. Where is your documentation.
    Opinions are like a$$ holes, everyone has one. My opinion is based upon fact and research, yours "emotion." Emotion lacks intelligence. Emotion makes for bad law.
    check out this intelligent man.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlklqr1dBrQ

    www.cfcoklahoma.org
  • Avendora
    One bad law is too many...
  • One sex offense is too many.
  • Ho hum... Every study you have read says the laws are doing more harm than good --and I have tunnel vision? Maybe you should broaden your scope of reading material.
  • MSLGWCEO
    I have no sympathy for repeat offenders either, or for those who did not know their victims or for violent rapists. However, the vast majority are not pedophile. incest
    makes and those known to the family are by far make up the greatest numbers and their recidivist rate across the board are in the single digits. The vast majority of registered sex offenders nation wide NEVER commit another sex offense. that is a proven FACT!!!!!!!
  • MSLGWCEO
    Well there is sensible minds who reason than there are closed minds who have tunnel vision.

    EVERY study I have read says these laws are causing more harm than good. If you put every registered sex offender on an island the rate of new crimes would barely be changed. The REAL threat comes from FAMILY members and those known to the family. EVERY study brings that out.
    The documentary, "Incest-A Family Tragedy," winner of 12 prestigious awards by Edward Blackhoff, brings out the fact that the family and those known to the family are the biggest threat to children . In the Blogtalkradio interview he states that 60 million Americans have experienced child sexual abuse and 30 million will go on to repeat what has been done to them. That's horrific!! However, most go unreported and unless We Americans get out of our own denial and educate ourselves and parent our children and teach them, there is very little, if anything any law can do. Every society since Adam and Eve without exception has experience child sexual abuse. Prevention through education is the only real key to this entire issue. Now those who do not know their victim, the repeat offender and the violent offender, I have no mercy for. There is an article on my site entitled, "Good Touch, Bad Touch." that every parent needs to read.
    www.cfcoklahoma.org
  • You are blurring the issue. When I speak of lifetime incarceration and the death penalty, I am referring to repeat offenders. This puts the odds at one offender against three convictions. Three convictions might just mean three separate victims. The innocent are still taking the risk here. This isn't a drastic, radical measure. It is a common sense effort to eradicate a dangerous, predatory element from society. Convicted offenders often refuse treatment, even if it is court ordered. Many offenders do not want to be treated. That is why they fail to register. That is why they abscond. That is why they go on to victimize more children.

    You seem to think the majority of convicted perverts are really innocent and deserve a second, or possible even third chance. Who is the extremist here?

    Tossing Nifong's name around doesn't add any credibility to your argument, either.
  • MSLGWCEO
    Be careful, your children can very easily be caught up in this rush to condemn and Mike Nifong is alive and well in every county, state and federal courthuuse in this land. Vindictive prosecution is legal and conviction is all that these prosecutors want. Innocence matters not, onlt a notch on their political record is what matters.

    See Ricky's story at Rickyslife.com. He is only one of many. We have children as young as 10 on the sex offender registries.
    Extremism is very dangerous. Two wrongs do not make a right.
    Also, see the film clip and listen to the Blogtalkradio interview with the producer Edward Blackhoff. "Incest-A family Tragedy." at cfcoklahoma.org
  • It is not the laws that endanger children, it is the Catch & Release system. If sex offenders are not released from prison, they cannot reoffend. Period. If we execute them, they cannot reoffend. Period.

    People can say that this doesn't serve as a deterrent to other sex offenders. Perhaps there is no deterrent to keep someone from offending. When we have identified an offender, however, we can prevent them from harming another child.

    So, the "emotion" is on the side of those who ball-bag over sex offenders being incarcerated or executed. The "intelligence" is in abatement.
  • MSLGWCEO
    Why is it that all the studies that come out say these laws do NOT protect children but rather puts them in danges. Stusy after study says the very same thing. Laws based on "emotion" make bad law because emotion lacks intelligence.

    * Alaska - (2007) http://www.ajc.state.ak.us/reports/1-07Criminal...

    * Arizona - (1988 - 1998) http://www.azcorrections.gov/adc/Factsheets/fac...
    Arizona, Department of Corrections, 2006
    http://www.azcorrections.gov/FACTSHEETS/Fact%20...
    • Length of time – Ten years
    • Sample size – 2,444 sex offenders
    • Results – 3.2% returned for a new felony sex offense, 1.4% returned for a new felony case of child molestation
    • Reoffense trigger – new conviction (Any conviction)

    * Arkansas http://www.acic.org/statistics/Research/SO_Repo...

    * California - (2005 - 2006) http://www.law.stanford.edu/program/centers/scj...

    * Colorado - (2003) http://dcj.state.co.us/ors/pdf/docs/WebTCpart1.pdf

    * Delaware (2007) http://budget.delaware.gov/sac/publications/doc...

    * Illinois (2002) http://www.icjia.state.il.us/public/pdf/Researc...

    * Iowa - (2000 - Page 10) http://www.state.ia.us/government/dhr/cjjp/imag...

    * Kentucky (2006) http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v07n1/01/sexoffender.pdf

    * Michigan - (2000 - Page 184) http://www.michigan.gov/documents/Stat2000_5144...
    Michigan, Department of corrections, 2000
    http://www.michigan.gov/documents/Stat2000_5144...
    • Length of time – Ten Years
    • Sample size – 70,989 offenders
    • Results: 2.46% for sex offense, 6.11% counting technical violations.

    * Minnesota - (2007) http://www.doc.state.mn.us/documents/04-07SexOf...
    Minnesota Department of Corrections, 1999
    http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:FSqlN1LCgc...
    • Sample size – 1,407 sex offenders
    • Length of time – 6.3 years.
    • Re-offense trigger – new arrest.
    • Results – 9% arrested for new sex crime.

    * Missouri - (2006) http://www.mosac.mo.gov/Documents/SOrecidivism.pdf

    * New York - 2007 http://dpca.state.ny.us/pdfs/somgmtbulletinmay2...

    * Ohio - (2006) http://www.ocjs.state.oh.us/Research/Sex%20Offe...
    Ohio, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, 2001
    http://www.drc.state.oh.us/web/Reports/Ten_Year...
    • Length of Study – 10 years
    • Sample size – 14,261 offenders
    • Re-offense trigger – re-incarceration
    • Results: Total sex-related recidivism rate, including technical violations of supervision conditions, was 11%. New sex crime after 10 years – 8%,

    * Oregon - (Page 7) http://www.oregon.gov/DOC/RESRCH/docs/Recid.pdf

    * Pennsylvania - (2005) http://www.cor.state.pa.us/stats/lib/stats/SexO...

    * Tennessee - (2007) http://www.tbi.state.tn.us/Info%20Systems%20Div...

    * Texas - (2005) http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/csot/csot_teffectiv...

    * Vermont - (2003) http://jiv.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/1/3
    Vermont Department of Corrections, 2003
    http://jiv.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/1/3
    • Sample size – 195 sex offenders
    • Length of time – 6 years
    • Re-offense rate – not defined.
    • Results – 5.4% for completed treatment, 30% for no-completed.

    * Virginia - (2001) http://www.vcsc.state.va.us/sex_off_report.pdf
    Virginia, Criminal Sentencing Commission,
    http://www.vcsc.state.va.us/sex_off_report.pdf
    • Length of time – 8 years.
    • Sample size – 579 sex offenders
    • Re-offense trigger – re-arrest (new crimes, sex and non-sex, and technical violations – including misdemeanors).
    • Results – new sex offense arrests accounted for 14.6%

    * Washington - 2005 http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/rptfiles/05-08-1202.pdf
    Washington State, Department of Corrections, 2002
    http://www.doc.wa.gov/budget/docs/publications/...
    • Length of time – 15 years
    • Sample size – 65,000 offenders
    • Re-offense trigger – return to prison (new convictions as well as parole violations).
    • Results – 17%

    * Wyoming - (2005 - Page 2) http://legisweb.state.wy.us/PubResearch/2005/05...
    Wyoming, Department of Corrections, 2005
    http://legisweb.state.wy.us/PubResearch/2005/05...
    • Length of study – unknown
    • Sample size – unknown
    • Re-offense trigger – unknown
    • Results: 4% to 5%.
    visit www.cfcoklahoma.org
blog comments powered by Disqus

CrimeShadows.com - Our Main Site - includes Unsolved Cases

Also, be sure to visit our other sub-sites:

Weleetka Double Homicide

Daytona Beach Murders

Parkway Murders

South Los Angeles Serial Murders

Mendocino County John & Jane Doe

Attack of Tama Hallmark

CrimeShadows News - the CrimeShadows Blog

ZodiacKillerTRUTH.com

CrimeShadows Message Board


© 2009 CrimeShadows News | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)