Knowledge is Power Against Crime and Criminals

While you're here, please take a minute or two to leave a comment. Your participation at CrimeShadows News is greatly appreciated.


29 Aug

Dennis Kaufman Turns Over Alleged Zodiac Killer Evidence to FBI


Images: Upper left is Arthur Leigh Allen, Richard Gaikowski. Further down is Jack Tarrance

ZodiacAllenGaikowskiUnless you are someone really interested in the case of the Zodiac Killer, or perhaps a late sixties Bay area resident, you are probably only familiar with the San Francisco serial killer from the movies. The most recent major movie production was David Fincher’s Zodiac. The movie introduces audiences to author Robert Graysmith’s favorite suspect, Arthur Leigh Allen, the most famous person of suspicion in the case.

Tom Voigt, of ZodiacKiller.com, has gathered an overwhelming amount of information on the case, much of which he has made freely available via his website. There are police reports, photographs, news articles, video, audio, and much, much more for the amateur Zodiac investigator to peruse. Tom also has had his favorite suspects over the years, including Arthur Leigh Allen. He has shifted his focus lately, however, to an underground newspaper editor named Richard Gaikowski. Tom, and a few other investigators, have gathered a large amount of information that they believe implicate Gaikowski in the killings.

To date, there is not one person I suspect of being the Zodiac Killer. That is, I do not think the killer has yet been identified as a suspect by anyone. I hope to see a good case put together someday. I hope this case will see the answers so many have been seeking for so many years.

In this post, I will write about a suspect that has received a certain amount of attention. The  proponent of the suspect theory and the theory itself,  have been the subject of much controversy over the years.

I have long been a critic of Dennis Kaufman, the man who claims his stepfather, Jack Tarrance, is the Zodiac Killer. In February of 2006, I wrote a post entitled Does Dennis Know Jack? wherein I expressed my opinion of Dennis Kaufman and his theory. The post detailed some correspondence between Dennis and myself, and he announced his upcoming book, The Man Behind the Mask. While there was some debate about the existence of such a book after it’s announced publication, I can say that there was a book, but that the quantity and quality of publication led many to believe that the book was nothing but a hoax.

As a webmaster who has covered the Zodiac Case for over two years now, I encounter many claims of Zodiac’s identity being uncovered and alleged solutions to the 340 cipher. Some of these people are obvious kooks and some have developed compelling cases for belief. Dennis Kaufman, in my opinion, falls somewhere in between. I do think that Dennis believes his own story. I just question how he has come to that conclusion. His story of Jack Tarrance, who admittedly held a striking resemblance to the Zodiac composite, was indeed compelling –at first glance. It’s when one began to take a hard look at the facts that the story seemed to lose all credibility.

The hard facts were… Well, there weren’t any. That was my main problem with his story. There was nothing placing Tarrance at the scene of any of the crimes. There was no DNA evidence. There was no fingerprint evidence. There was no solid confession, although Dennis claims there was. The audio of the alleged confession is there on his site. Dennis does claim to have other audio where he directly came out and asked his stepfather if he was , indeed, the Zodiac. This audio has never been presented to the public. There were supposed to be items that Dennis had seen proving his case, but he claims he didn’t show them to law enforcement, or even confiscate them for his own investigation, because he didn’t want to offend his stepbrother. Dennis has spent years making this claim. If he had the chance to actually prove his credibility, why wouldn’t he? He claims it is his obligation. I just couldn’t believe that he turned down the chance at redemption so as not to hurt the feelings of someone he hardly even knew. After all, if what Dennis is saying is true, he was holding the key to the man responsible for the cruel deaths of many victims.

TarranceDennis claims his stepfather was responsible for his mother’s death. The death certificate indicates she died from “cardio respiratory arrest, anoxic brain injury, respiratory failure, and autoimmune cholangitis. There is nothing mentioned pertaining to a homicide. While he may blame his stepfather for her demise, a homicide was never proven. To my knowledge, the only thing that Jack Tarrance has ever been arrested for is poaching. He may be a mean sonofabitch, the world is full of them, but so far there is nothing pointing to Tarrance as a murderer.

The strongest evidence Dennis has presented to the public pointing to Jack Tarrance as the Zodiac Killer are weak at best. First, there’s a recorded phone call that Dennis claims is an admission of guilt by his stepfather. This confession is is not a direct statement. One could interpret Tarrance’s words as simply being a dubious response to a very strange sort of question. Then there are handwriting comparisons between known Zodiac letters and the writing of Tarrance. The writing looks a lot alike –not a perfect match. As an amateur researcher of the Zodiac case, I can tell you, I have seen many handwriting exemplars that match as well, if not better. Finally, there is the resemblance to the composite sketch. Jack Tarrance looks like the Zodiac sketch. He looks eerily like the sketch. However, so do a lot of other people. There is simply nothing so far that tells us that with all certainty “Jack Tarrance was the Zodiac Killer.”

I have often said the only reason that Jack Tarrance is even discussed as a Zodiac suspect is because Dennis Kaufman does his best to keep the story in the news. I saw that a lot of people were hitting on my site looking for information about Dennis Kaufman all of a sudden, so I checked the news. It is because of this renewed media attention that I feel the need to weigh in on the subject. Many people who have just read the articles about this “new evidence” can’t understand why this isn’t a major news story. They think this is the first time Dennis Kaufman has accused his stepfather of being the Zodiac Killer. This is not the case –not the case at all.

You see, Dennis Kaufman first gained media attention with his allegations eight years ago when he first told the FBI about his suspicions that Jack Tarrance was the Zodiac. He appeared on national television  with his claims and used the alias “Kenny Kilgore.” Jack Tarrance died on August 26, 2006, six years after Dennis first turned the FBI onto Jack Tarrance. To this day, the Zodiac case has remained unsolved.

But, Dennis isn’t finished. He’s still convinced that his stepfather is the infamous Bay area killer. And now, Dennis is back in the media spotlight. His story is much greater now. His claims are much more chilling.

Dennis says that he was going through some of his deceased stepfather’s belongings and he found a knife that was covered in what he believes may be blood. “It could be a knife he barbequed with or a knife he murdered someone with,” Dennis said. He also says that he opened up an old PA system and discovered an item similar to garb once donned by the Zodiac Killer. “It was a black hood with a Zodiac on it,” according to Dennis. And, perhaps the most shocking items revealed by Dennis, are photographs depicting what appears to be homicide victims.

What items have actually been turned over for investigation are not exactly clear. The video of the new interview with Dennis Kaufman shows him handling the hood and the knife, casting doubt on whether either of those items have been given to the FBI. Dennis claims to have several rolls of undeveloped film he is also planning to give to the investigators. He believes they may contain more shocking images.

Note: Dennis has instructed me to be more observant; he is wearing plastic gloves as he handles the items. I checked the video and he is, indeed, wearing plastic gloves.

CBS13 is reporting that the FBI confirmed that  they are testing some items that “may link a suspect to a killer.” I do have questions regarding this “new evidence.” Why is Kaufman handling the items if they are important pieces of evidence? Why did he touch them at all? Why is it that all of these things are only now worthy of investigation and only now coming to light? Tarrance, has after all, has been dead for two years now.

I have sent an email to Dennis asking for more details. As of this writing, I have not yet received an answer. However, I only sent it a short while ago, so he may not have had time to respond. I told him I would keep an open mind concerning this new information.  I have looked things over and watched some of the video. As you can see, I have reached a tentative conclusion that should comes as no surprise. As always, I will be receptive to new information. I look forward to the FBI’s conclusion, though I seriously doubt anything else will be heard. I’ll be sure to update if Dennis decides to respond to my inquiries.

Update: I did receive a response from Dennis after this post was published. Needless to say, he was not happy with my post. To date, he has not answered the questions I had asked him on August 29. He did indicate he wore plastic gloves to handle the items. The actual questions (verbatim) are below:

–Why has your message board been disabled? (Re-enabled August 31)

–Has the hood been turned over for testing?

–What about the knife. I notice that you have been handling it. Has it been tested for evidence?

–Is there any sign (blood) that the hood may have been used in an attack?

–My view has always been that the DNA and fingerprint samples are useless for ruling a suspect “out” but a match would be very supportive of a person’s involvement. What sort of results do you expect in that regard?

This post will be updated should Dennis decide to answer a few of the more skeptical questions.

If this new investigation doesn’t have the result that Dennis Kaufman wants us to anticipate, the implications could be even more damaging to his already shaky reputation. It might just mean that things were exaggerated, perhaps even fabricated to further this story. That would be a reach by Kaufman I do not want to see. As I said, I think he really believes that Tarrance is the Zodiac. I know he wants us to believe along with him. I hope that any convincing is done earnestly and honestly.

Recently we have seen Leonard Padilla tell us that Casey would be talking –bogus. A real, live sasquatch was found in the northern woods of Georgia, a boatload of DNA evidence –bogus.

I realize that with all of this important FBI investigating and new found evidence and everything,  my skepticism may make a fool of me. How can I, knowing the FBI is actually involved, stand up and say this is bogus? After all, there are photos of murdered people –how can you explain that? Dennis may have the opportunity to laugh in my face at my years of being his critic and say ” I told you so!”

I’m willing to take that chance. No matter how exciting this new information appears to be, I can not bring myself to believe that Jack Tarrance is the Zodiac Killer.

Sources and Links:

Zodiac Killer’s Identity And Weapon Uncovered?

Zodiac Killer’s Identity Could be Revealed

Zodiac Killer’s Identity And Weapon Uncovered?

Does Dennis Know Jack?

ZodiacKillerTRUTH.com

  • farang

    “No matter how exciting this new information appears to be, I can not bring myself to believe that Jack Tarrance is the Zodiac Killer.”

    You aren't trying to say your BELIEFS mean a damn thing, right? How's about waiting a day or two for the FBI to confirm or deny? Not like there is a hurry, or anything. I think you may be correct, that there is no link to Tarrance, but I'd like to hear what the DNA says first before inserting my foot in mouth.

    Just one of those “late 60's residents of the Bay Area” speaking….

    farang

  • farang

    BTW: zodiackiller.com wants cash to read their opinions. No thanks.

  • farang

    “No matter how exciting this new information appears to be, I can not bring myself to believe that Jack Tarrance is the Zodiac Killer.”

    You aren't trying to say your BELIEFS mean a damn thing, right? How's about waiting a day or two for the FBI to confirm or deny? Not like there is a hurry, or anything. I think you may be correct, that there is no link to Tarrance, but I'd like to hear what the DNA says first before inserting my foot in mouth.

    Just one of those “late 60's residents of the Bay Area” speaking….

    farang

  • farang

    BTW: zodiackiller.com wants cash to read their opinions. No thanks.

  • http://CrimeShadows.com crimeshadows

    Quote: “You aren't trying to say your BELIEFS mean a damn thing, right? How's about waiting a day or two for the FBI to confirm or deny? Not like there is a hurry, or anything. I think you may be correct, that there is no link to Tarrance, but I'd like to hear what the DNA says first before inserting my foot in mouth.

    My beliefs may not mean a damn thing, but this is my blog and that is where I post them, and, obviously, you read them. I'm still waiting for the response from the FBI. If the evidence says anything besides “Moo,” I will gladly admit to being wrong.

  • http://CrimeShadows.com crimeshadows

    Quote: “You aren't trying to say your BELIEFS mean a damn thing, right? How's about waiting a day or two for the FBI to confirm or deny? Not like there is a hurry, or anything. I think you may be correct, that there is no link to Tarrance, but I'd like to hear what the DNA says first before inserting my foot in mouth.

    My beliefs may not mean a damn thing, but this is my blog and that is where I post them, and, obviously, you read them. I'm still waiting for the response from the FBI. If the evidence says anything besides “Moo,” I will gladly admit to being wrong.

  • pat

    http://www.zodiackiller.com/mba/gzd/782.html

    You might want to check this too. Sounds fishy to me.

  • Schlumpf

    Kaufman is a Kook! Take a look at some e-mails he has sent over the years…

    http://www.zodiackiller.com/mba/gzd/782.html

  • pat

    http://www.zodiackiller.com/mba/gzd/782.html

    You might want to check this too. Sounds fishy to me.

  • Schlumpf

    Kaufman is a Kook! Take a look at some e-mails he has sent over the years…

    http://www.zodiackiller.com/mba/gzd/782.html

  • andyi

    Just a quick comment. I moved to the bay area in Nov 69. The z was news then. I saw the hit on fox news re: Jack Tarrance a few weeks ago and have wasted lots of time reading the different blogs. This is the most neutral website I've seen in my opinion on the Z, so I have the following question. The SFPD picked up latent prints on some of the crime scenes according to what I've read. Mr. Tarrance was arrested in 71 & 74. Where is the comparison to these prints. nuff said

  • andyi

    Just a quick comment. I moved to the bay area in Nov 69. The z was news then. I saw the hit on fox news re: Jack Tarrance a few weeks ago and have wasted lots of time reading the different blogs. This is the most neutral website I've seen in my opinion on the Z, so I have the following question. The SFPD picked up latent prints on some of the crime scenes according to what I've read. Mr. Tarrance was arrested in 71 & 74. Where is the comparison to these prints. nuff said

  • Nick Baker

    I just recently got interested in the case myself. Being a born and raised San Fransican and growing up in the 80's I heard a lot of talk about the Zodiac. Over the years, I've passingly read much of what has been written about the case, mostly because i remember things my mother told me as I was growing up in San Francisco. I like your website and your neutrality. I do agree that Mr. Kaufman's story is fishy and seems to have other motives. I'm glad I'm not alone, and clearly the FBI is taking all this with a grain of salt too. I only recenly saw the news about Kaufman and didn't know until I looked at your site that he has been making these claims for years now. I do have to disagree with you and say that, after reading Robert Graysmith's books twice, looking at the evidence and the case, I believe that Arthur Leigh Allen and an accomplice did the deeds. But I am not even an ameteur investigator. Just a person interested in the case and my local history giving an opinion.

  • Nick Baker

    I just recently got interested in the case myself. Being a born and raised San Fransican and growing up in the 80's I heard a lot of talk about the Zodiac. Over the years, I've passingly read much of what has been written about the case, mostly because i remember things my mother told me as I was growing up in San Francisco. I like your website and your neutrality. I do agree that Mr. Kaufman's story is fishy and seems to have other motives. I'm glad I'm not alone, and clearly the FBI is taking all this with a grain of salt too. I only recenly saw the news about Kaufman and didn't know until I looked at your site that he has been making these claims for years now. I do have to disagree with you and say that, after reading Robert Graysmith's books twice, looking at the evidence and the case, I believe that Arthur Leigh Allen and an accomplice did the deeds. But I am not even an ameteur investigator. Just a person interested in the case and my local history giving an opinion.

  • ironman

    The lastest news daughter of the Zodiac Deborah Perez , she has recved wolrd wide news, the attention to her story has benn taken by storm from reporter around the world unlike Dennis Kaufman, her story has prompted SFPD to open the case after being closed fror so many yrs, have you talked to her have you herad her story , the OC register news paper investogating Mike Mello tells her story and several other national news papers continue to follow up with indept acticles. her facts and time lines of the places her father lived during his life and visited seem to fit with the time line of the murders, there seems to be more to her story than what meets the eye. unlike Denise Kaufman and Voit shes not selling DVDs,$9.99 books, or web site memberships . Deborah Perez contiues to provide information that is not made public relating to the crime scenes which has caught the ears of investagative reporters and LE. unlike Denise Kaufmans as Miss Perez states Let LE do there job and follow the facts and the evidence. in the OC register 5-6-09 Deborah said this was the right thing to do. I wanted to get the truth out..Im not here for the lime light Nobody would want this lime light. i LOST MY FATHER MY CHILDHOOD AND NOW iVE LOST MY LIFE i KNOW. there is something to here story.

  • http://CrimeShadows.com crimeshadows

    I've already posted on Perez. – http://crimeshadowsnews.com/main/2009/04/was-gu

    Also according to Perez, her father was John F. Kennedy. The press release was promoted by her Hollywood publicist. Perez has a documentary in the works. Just because the press follows a story, doesn't make it credible. It wasn't too long ago a press release was announcing a real Bigfoot corpse. It turned out to be a gorilla costume and some roadkill. Perez and Kaufman are very much alike. They both have a bogus story to tell.

    P.S. – You should really try using spellcheck.

  • http://pooh-bear-loves-me.piczo.com/ `gigie

    OMG! can`t believe this!

  • richardlarsen

    I am dennis's Brother -in law and I can tell you right now Jack Tarrance in no way could be the zodiac but he was a mean son of a bitch.The pics Dennis put on the news back in April were of his sisters boyfriend that died in Mich. from a fall from a railroad bridge some 30 or 40 feet/ His name is Noel Shaw he died in 96. Just one more lie Mr. Kuafman has said.

  • http://CrimeShadows.com crimeshadows

    Thanks so much for speaking out. A lot of us have been wondering about the nature of the photos. I am shocked. I really used to think Dennis believed the crap he was trying to sell. Now we all know what he is.

  • richardlarsen

    In just wanted to let you all know that I have the case # on Noel Shaw and am getting all the police photos the case # is 199700000064 Port Huron Mich. Det. Jim Jones is the officer you want to talk to he knows all about this case

  • 2upset

    Its extremly upsetting to me to see this being thrown in my face as if it were yesterday that Noel was taken from me. how my brother can do this and actually having cbs plaster this picture without investigating first is horrifing. what dennis or anyone even understands is the pain that I buried for so many years has to effect me all over again this is insain and I can't bare the thought all these people actually believe dennis. Noel was not only my boyfriend at the time of his death but my daughters father. This is awful and I have the actual pictures that I will not post because it isn't pretty and I refuse to let the chance my daughter could see these to even be out here.

  • 2upset

    Yes dennis is a kook He unfortunetly is my brother and he obviously don't care who he hurts while trying to make a buck I have been trying to contact these FBI agents but nobody will return my calls. Kris Pickel has emailed me but has yet to call this is destroying me and nobody will listen to the truth yet everyone will listen to dennis who does not even work for a living.

  • 2upset

    Thank you ick you know what for

  • http://CrimeShadows.com crimeshadows

    I am sorry that Noel has been exploited in this manner and that you and your family have to suffer at the expense of this fraud. I really had no idea that Dennis would sink to this level. I only knew that he has built his story from exaggerations and coincidence. Now it looks as if his story has been bolstered with fabrication and outright lies. Hopefully, Dennis will stop this charade soon and put this long, embarrassing episode to rest.

    I encourage Kris Pickel at CBS13 to investigate this and report on it with as much vigor as she has put into spreading Dennis's phony story. However, I doubt very much that will happen. It's hard to admit when you've been a chump.

  • 2upset

    thank u crimeshadows Kris Pickel is a chump and she should not be a reporter. any good reporters know Good Stories Do not just fall in their laps. If she would have investigated she would have caugh t dennis's lies from the beginning. He was born in Michigan and lived with his real father at some point in his life and if Jack was the only father dennis knew then why did dennis fly to michigan September 2002 and bury his real father. She got what she thought was a story and ran with it with no investigation.

  • 2upset

    Thank You crime shadows for your sincerity. dennis unfortunetly probably won't stop. he seriously thinks he has his butt covered, and deep down I believe he honestly believes his lies. he has hurt me and my other sister and all he wants is money and a spot in a movie cause he knows nothing of a real JOB. As far as Kris Pickel she is a chump and I have emailed her she doesn't appoligize one time in her e-mails back. Dennis lied from day one he attended his biological father's funeral in sept. 2002.

  • 2upset

    Well the good news is the FBI does not believe Dennis either that was another lie. I just spoke to the agent and all Dennis has is circumstantial evidence huh what a crock I believe its fabricated evidence. Dennis needs to be stopped and I'm told there is nothing I can do. I have to relive this nightmare so Dennis can have his satisfaction. What a horrible life Dennis lives to have to be so angry with the life he chose that he expects everyone else to have to be just as miserable. The best advise he needs is to get a real job and leave his family out of his caios we don't want to take anymore of his BS. We are fed up with his threats when he doesn't get his way, and most of all we are fed up with is bullying and hurtful things he does to us.

  • richardlarsen

    Dennis Kuafman has said that it is a pic of Noel Shaw still says he does not know him and the pic was in Jacks box of film. I wounder how he knows its Noel since he doesnt know Noel strange ID. I know FBI friend told him Woops prob… they dont have pics… I know magic. Lets see him get out of this one

  • curiousmind

    If this does turn out to be bogus (which most likely it will), I would be curious to find out how he came to possess the “murder pics”….who really took them? Could he himself be some sort of sicko? If it is bogus what he is saying about his step dad…..maybe HE should be checked…..not as the zodiac (of course), but maybe something about him? It's a strange world and stranger things have happened? Maybe getting attention indirectly? Has he been checked out himself? Maybe it's a sick game of his own….

  • curiousmind

    The reason I say this is that I followed some links on here, and he sounds as if he has a very odd fantasy going on. Threatening people, trying to impress people as a “high ranking Satanist” LOL and I just find he has some characteristics that are a bit scary. Living his fantasies vicariously through someone else…. Just a gut feeling. He REALLY seems to want to attach himself to this in an intimate way…why? I don't think it's just money…..it goes deeper. He is crazy. Also he seems to want to affiliate himself with the police (he even tries to say the cops are satanists)…just like him haha!)

  • solver

    Do you know Noels hidden magik?

  • solver

    Do you know Noels hidden magik?

  • Otis Chitse Dhaiz

    You might be right, but then, that boy has said some very mean things about me.

  • http://CrimeShadows.com crimeshadows

    Clever anagram, Erica.

  • aphroditejones

    I have done an episode about the Zodiac for my show TRUE CRIME, airing on ID on April 8, 2010. In it, I record Dennis Kaufman's allegations about Jack Tarrance, and hope to allow the audience to make their own diagnosis about the veracity of DK's statements. I realize that so many armchair detectives have become obsessed with the idea of solving the Zodiac murders. I also realize that, because the SFPD only has a partial DNA sample available of the Zodiac, this case will probably never be conclusively solved. All I ask of those “in the know” about the Zodiac suspects and various claims being made, is to keep an open mind to the True Crime show that is about to air – - and please send me your feedback – - as it will mean the world to me to hear directly from people who can see the pros and cons of the case Kaufman makes. I hope it is understood that I am not giving Dennis Kaufman any entitlements as positively found the “solution” to the Zodiac case. I am just presenting HIS case, in the hopes that someone will see the possibility that DK could be right about his stepfather, Jack. Please contact me at: aphrodite.jones@yahoo.com. I would sincerely love to hear your feedback once the show has aired.

  • aphroditejones

    AS some of you are aware, I have taped a show on the ZODIAC for TRUE CRIME which will be airing on the ID network on April 8th, 2010. I ask, sincerely, that those of you who are experts in the case, please try to keep an open mind to the claims that Dennis Kaufman will make to me. I realize there are many who are skeptical of DK, and I am not suggesting that he has solved the Zodiac case. In fact, because the SFPD only has a partial DNA sample of the Zodiac available, I feel this case will never be conclusively resolved — ever. Still, with that in mind, I believe DK presents a more compelling case than anyone has given him credit for. I would appreciate your feedback and reviews after you have seen the show on April 8th. I am always open to other theories and alternate forms of proof. As a person who has devoted my life to True Crime, I have one important thing in common with everyone on this site: I want to see this murder mystery solved and give some peace to the victims' families who live with this horror every day.

  • Ron

    A great many of us gave Dennis the benefit of the doubt when he started making his claims years ago. Many viewed his information with an open mind. The problem is, when they looked deeper at his claims and evidence, the story started to fall apart. Add to that Dennis' continuous attempts to profit from the case by selling evidence, selling his story to anyone who would listen, selling DVDs, selling books that may or may not actually exist, etc. Couple that with what we know about his character and criminal history away from the Zodiac case, and it becomes increasingly harder to view anything he says with an open mind. Did I mention the fly-by-night document examiner that he has retained on the case? The “expert” whose only qualification is being a student of the school of handwriting that produced such glorious conclusions as John Mark Karr wrote the JonBenet Ramsey ransom note. The “expert” who has linked Jack Tarrance handwriting to every unsolved (and some solved) serial crimes of the last 60+ years. Did I mention the numerous falsehoods dealing with the photographic evidence and the professor who claims expertise in photo interpretation, who also just happens to have purchased the rights to Dennis' story? I don't have any particular axe to grind with Dennis, I just have a good sense of smell and know which end of the bull his story is coming from. I think anyone who airs the Jack Tarrance story, has not vetted the information very well, since most of his “evidence” has been neatly refuted on many occasions by folks interested in the Zodiac case.

  • bettycalder

    Could anyone tell me if the bullets used in the killings were made by machine at the killers home?

CrimeShadows.com - Our Main Site - includes Unsolved Cases

Also, be sure to visit our other sub-sites:

Weleetka Double Homicide

Daytona Beach Murders

Parkway Murders

South Los Angeles Serial Murders

Mendocino County John & Jane Doe

Attack of Tama Hallmark

CrimeShadows News - the CrimeShadows Blog

ZodiacKillerTRUTH.com

CrimeShadows Message Board


© 2014 CrimeShadows News | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)

Copy Protected by Tech Tips's CopyProtect Wordpress Blogs.